|
|
|
|
When
I was growing up, I looked forward to nothing else like
I did Christmas morning. Santa always spoiled me rotten,
and I was always blown away by what he brought and how he
arranged the gifts. It felt like torture to count off days
on my Advent calendar, as absorbed in yuletide's crass marketing
as I was. I was always restless in bed the night before,
anticipating what Santa had in store for me. I struggled
to stay in bed until dawn, when I knew I could burst into
my parents' room and "accidentally" wake them
up so we could start opening presents.
My Christmas wish list was promptly submitted about a month
in advance, like clockwork every year, the day after Thanksgiving
(a.k.a. "Black Friday"). My parents and Santa
worked together like a well-oiled machine and delivered
a slew of nothing but goodies I had requested. Ah, but which
goodies? Prior to the big reveal on Christmas morning (we
were not a Christmas Eve gift-exchanging family), my sister
and I knew the gifts were scattered around our two-floor
house, usually concentrated in our parents' bedroom closets
and up in the creepy attic and crawlspaces above the living
floors. Every year, I was faced with the same conundrum:
Do I seek out the surely-unwrapped presents and check out
what I'm going to get? Or do I wait and preserve the element
of surprise?
|
|
|
Most years, I hedged on the persistent and gut-wrenching
desire to find out what I was getting. Meanwhile, my sister
would gleefully ransack closets and squeal some of the things
she saw. If I happened to be nearby, or if our parents weren't
home and my sister was shouting across the house, I plugged
my ears and begged her to stop telling me what gifts I'd
be getting. Nothing quite compares to unwrapping a present
on Christmas morning with genuine cluelessness as to what
is inside.
That adrenaline rush of the bona fide reveal was tantamount
to any temporary buzz I felt when actively trying to ruin
the surprise. Not to mention my parents would not be happy
that my sister and I were sneaking around the house and
unearthing gifts they had strived to surprise us with.
I distinctly remember one year when my parents had somehow
found an extremely popular video game that every kid was
desperate for. During a weak moment, I rifled through my
mother's bureau and found a few Christmas items, including
the sought-after game. My happiness instantly downshifted.
I even went so far as to carefully open the package and
play a few rounds of the game before my parents got home
from work, delicately resealing the package and replacing
it exactly where it lie in the drawer.
The damage was done, I figured. I already knew I had the
gift; might as well play with it and get myself acquainted.
That Christmas morning? My face probably betrayed my guilt.
The big moment, the big reveal, had been thwarted. The big
surprise that year occurred when I, all alone weeks prior,
surreptitiously pushed aside some socks and saw the cardboard
packaging of the game.
This personal history is a long-winded analogy to explain
how I currently feel about the Confessions Tour,
or any of the tours Madonna has launched since I have been
a big fan. In this analogy, of course, Madonna is Santa.
(No, this does not mean I expect Madge to belt out Santa
Baby.)
|
|
|
And everything from the set list to the costumes to the
lighting design is a giant pile of gifts. Even the people
that are collaborating with her? Let's call them elves.
Every little piece I learn about the tour beforehand chips
away a scintilla of fun of the big reveal, the big moment
that I am catching the tour live.
It's enough that I - and everyone else who has bought tickets
and viewed a seating chart - know the stage has three catwalk-type
extensions protruding from it. Despite my best intentions
and respectful friends that try their best not to let any
information slip, I have heard a few rumored songs on the
set list. I'm not talking about the so-called givens, nearly
all tracks, if not every single track, off Confessions
on a Dance Floor. We all knew this was going to
be a dance-heavy, disco-flavored show. One of the classics
I now know to part of the show will be utterly incredible,
but still … it would have been nice to be surprised
with it!
And I think I, unfortunately, have a general sense of some
of the show's "themes." I hope I heard and read
incorrectly. I want to be amazed when Madonna gets thrown
into an electric chair or a skateboarder does aerial tricks
off a half-pipe. I don't want to expect anything. No wigs,
no dancers, no props.
|
|
|
The little
boy in me still wants his Christmas to be a surprise. When
I see the word "spoiler" on web sites describing
the show, I run screaming from the room. Last time I opened
a web browser and without warning stumbled upon a "confirmed"
classic Madonna would perform, I seriously considered bleaching
my eyes to erase the memory. (Kids, don't try that at home!)
Not that there is a wrong way to appreciate the tour. My
best friend called me during one of the performances of
2001's Drowned World in London. He thought
he was doing me a favor by letting me hear Beautiful
Stranger, weeks before I would hear it myself live
in New York. When he held the phone out and I could make
out the familiar background music over the fuzzy crowd noise,
I immediately hung up and fruitlessly tried to put a mental
block around what I had just heard. Too late. During the
concert in New York, when Mike Myers appeared as Austin
Powers on the video screen to introduce the song, it was
vaguely anti-climactic. Like I had already played the video
game and watched as those around me discovered their gifts
for the very first time. Like virgins, you could say.
The rest of Drowned World was pretty "shocking"
to me, in a good way. I did not expect La Isla Bonita
or an instrumental Don't Cry For Me Argentina.
(In the midst of the latter number, my friends and I guessed
that Madge would do a little Eva Peron after the tango segment.
Guessing what's next, even incorrectly, is half the fun
of Madonna concerts.) Not one person who avoided spoilers
could have foreseen the incredible wirework fighting of
Sky Fits Heaven. The non-jaded crowd was
floored.
Re-Invention in 2004 was a tougher tour
to avoid getting information about beforehand because I
was deeper into my career in the entertainment industry
and my fanhood had grown. I opted not to pick up magazines
featuring sneak peeks of the tour and resisted reading any
reviews until after the show premiered in New York.
|
|
|
What a treat
to be so in the dark as to the content of the extravaganza.
Material Girl just blew people away, and
Imagine was such an out-of-left-field entry
that, two years later, the fact it has become so synonymous
with the tour does nothing to dull the amazement Madonna
was covering John Lennon.
Granted, learning what to expect before seeing the show
live might loosen up the big fan and help orientate those
who want – no, need!!! – to know exactly where
to look, what to pay attention to, what songs to brush up
on, etc. And does Madonna's team want us to know what we
can find out about the tour? Are the widely-reported "leaks"
actually controlled with the intention of disseminating
tidbits of information that get us salivating? We'll never
know if we're meant to feel guilty for digging up nuggets
about the show before it debuts.
To me, the more in the dark I am, the richer the experience.
It's a matter of personal preference, how strong one is
in the face of temptation and the value added of being surprised
versus knowing what to expect.
Now, before you all start voting for what you're most excited
for this summer, allow me a few minutes to quietly close
the sock drawer, tiptoe out of the room, and put earplugs
in.
|
|
|
|
|