|
|
|
|
|
As everyone knows on this site's message board, I adore Madonna---but
I certainly don't defend everything she's done as an entertainer
(my last column on the "American Life" project confirms
that). But, well, I had a bit of an irk (no, a big
irk), when I saw the following quote:
"Everything she did after the Like A Virgin album was
irrelevant, because it was a media circus that fueled her
after that, not any talent on her part or anything like that".
Ummm... .what? ! ? Everything post-Like A Virgin irrelevant?
Does this person realize how much relevance, iconography,
and significance Madonna has created since Like A Virgin?
So, all her work in bringing AIDS to the public forefront,
all her work in empowering females with their sexuality, all
her work in creating some of the best pop songs and most established
videos, all her work in making the world talk about what it
means to be a woman, a man, gay, straight (I could go on on
and on here for pages)---all that work is irrelevant? ! ?
All of this is purely a "media circus" 20+ year
creation where it holds absolutely no worth or weight whatsoever?
Say what you will about this woman, but the above statement
has to be one of the stupidest comments to ever come out of
a Madonna detractor's mouth. Does this person honestly think
a 20+ year career can be built on purely a "media circus"?
Nope, sorry buddy, it's not possible, and let me explain why.
First off, the media has not always been on Madonna's side.
There have been plenty of times in Madonna's career that her
detractors in the media have been more than happy to try and
cut her down to ashes if they could.
Shall I give examples? Let's see, we have: The Playboy scandal
in 1985, the Papa Don't Preach scandal in 1986, the Like A
Prayer scandal in 1989, the Blond Ambition/faux masturbation
scandal in 1990, the Justify My Love scandal later that same
year, the Truth or Dare scandal in 1991, the Sex book scandal
in 1992, the Motherhood controversy in 1996 (where they claimed
she became pregnant for publicity purposes), the Kabbalah
controversy which has been happening since 1997 (time and
time again she's been accused of being a Kabbalah poseur),
the Malawi adoption controversy in 2006, the list goes on
and on.
In other words, practically every year, every other year,
or every few years, the detractors have tried to make Madonna
out to be the worst thing to ever come across society.
She's all controversy, no substance they've said. She's all
sex, no talent they've said. She's all hype, no delivery they've
said. She's the anti-Christ they've said. She's bringing morality
down across the world they've said. She's done everything
for publicity and attention, and everyone has been idiotic
enough to buy into it they've said. The detractors in the
media, and there's been plenty of them, are a very vocal bunch
who've had their voices heard on print, television, film etc.
So, the idea that the media has always been on Madonna's side
is simply nonsense.
|
|
|
Secondly, the "media circus" this individual
describes, which has supposedly "fueled" her entire
career is a bit of a stretch isn't it?
Yes, the media has created plenty of attention surrounding
Madonna and her endeavors, that is something I certainly
wouldn't deny. So what? As if Madonna is the only artist
where controversy and a "media circus" have fueled
a career? Give me a break.
Plenty of other musical artist's careers have been fueled
by media attention and controversy. Let's name some of them
shall we? John Lennon, the Beatles, Elvis Presley, Elton
John, Queen, The Rolling Stones, David Bowie, Prince---these
are some of the most influential artists of our time. Does
media attention and controversy make them any less talented,
legit, or worthy? Nope, it doesn't. Artists such as Elton
John and David Bowie were smart about trying to control
the "media circus" surrounding them to best benefit
her career. Madonna is no different from any other postmodern
musical artist out there. She grew up in the age of uber-media,
and instead of fighting against it, she became a part of
it, and learned how to somewhat control it---like many others
before her have done, and like many others after her will
continue to do.
Lastly, we come to the age-old argument of Madonna not being
talented. Is Madonna the best singer? Absolutely not! Some
of her vocal performances on The Who's That Girl Tour and
especially on the iconic Blond Ambition Tour have been absolutely
horrid. Let's also not forget her various vocal performances
on awards shows, like "Nothing Really Matters"
from the 1999 Grammy's and "Ray of Light" from
the 1998 MTV Video Music Awards.
Seriously, they are cringe-worthy... you literally feel
sorry for her while you watch her perform because her voice
is so terrible. Is she the best dancer? Nah... although
she's certainly far more stylistic and athletic than a lot
of other dancers out there in the pop culture world. Is
she the most creative songwriter and producer out there?
Nope. There are other solo artists out there like Bjork,
Sinead O'Connor, and Fiona Apple who put Madonna's songwriting
skills and production skills to shame.
BUT... this doesn't mean Madonna is devoid
of talent. Because, although there are plenty of other artists
out there more talented than Madonna, she is still talented
in all the arena's I just listed. She is still a good singer
(in fact, she has improved phenomenally since her original
debut in 1982, just listen to performances like "Live
To Tell" from The Confessions Tour in 2006, or "Lament"
from The Re-Invention Tour in 2004---absolutely gorgeous
vocal performances from her), she can still kick ass on
the dance floor (you show me another woman in her late 40's
who danced as well, as strongly, and as solidly as Madonna
did on her last two tours---and try doing the moves from
"Where's The Party" from the Blond Ambition Tour
in 1990, it's not an easy feat my friends), and her songwriting/production
skills at times are rather impressive.
Songwriting-wise, take songs like "Till Death Do Us
Part", "Cherish", "Rain", "Drowned
World/Substitute For Love", "Ray of Light",
and "What It Feels Like For a Girl" for example.
Songwriting isn't about making complicated lyrics with impressive
words that make you go, wow, that person is smart! Songwriting,
at least in the world of pop music, is about writing lyrics
to a melody and production that seem to fit it so perfectly
and poetically... that you can't imagine the track being
written any other way. The songs I just listed accomplished
just that. Madonna's production skills, in terms of musical
innovation (or bringing something from the underground,
and melding it to a pop song the masses can listen to),
are plentiful.
But, I feel some prime examples are: "Live To Tell",
"Like A Prayer", "Waiting", "Ray
of Light", "Music", "Get Together",
etc. Here are songs where they each have unique production
to them, and it's not your standard sound for a "creamy
smooth pop icon goddess"---yet, with Madonna, she makes
those songs work with flying colors.
I'm sure the detractor would argue this is all Madonna's
production team, but the truth is, the detractor has no
proof of that. Instead, we have incredibly talented producers
and songwriters who have all said in interviews that Madonna
is far more involved than people believe her to be. They've
described situations where Madonna already has the melody,
and she brings it to the table, and they develop the song
from there. Or, they've described scenarios where they have
brought a melody to Madonna, and Madonna has developed both
the melody and the lyrics from the original foundation.
Hmmm... not bad for a woman who is supposedly talentless
and simply has a "team" who creates the music
for her.
Now, I could begin to touch on the comment
regarding her "irrelevance", but in all honesty,
it would be pointless for me to go into that because it's
simply dumb to sit here and defend Madonna's relevance in
the world.
|
|
|
Just look at the
current pop world around you my friend... Madonna's influence
is all around you. I could easily write another column on
her relevance, but a paragraph here wouldn't do it justice
so I'm not even going to bother defending just how relevant
Madonna is.
Phew... ok, so to conclude... the original statement made
by the individual in my first paragraph? Stupid, stupid, stupid?
Yes. Because, ultimately, no matter whether you like, dislike,
or could care less about Madonna... the truth is that there
is no way in hell Madonna would've been able to have lasted
as long as she did on simply a "media circus". It
takes hard work, talent, ambition, balls, brains, luck, and
a public who continues to be interested to last in this business
for as long as Madonna has lasted. Furthermore, if it wasn't
for Madonna's supposed "irrelevance" post the Like
A Virgin album, a strong percentage of pop culture history
would no longer exist!
So, here's to you Madonna... our queen, our Madge, and fuck
what the detractors say. You may not be the "best"
at everything, but all together, to me... and to the millions
of us who continue to buy your records, see your concerts,
and write columns such as this... you're the best,
period. Irrelevant and talentless my ass... sheesh!
|
|
|
---Cristian Gonzales
"cristian_nyc" on MadonnaTribe.
|
|
|
The Madonna Tribe Team welcomes longtime contributor and Community
member Cristian Gonzales aka cristian_nyc
as the brand new columnist and writer who will be sharing
his thoughts, his emotions and his views about the lady we
all love in his brand new space - "'Cause I Got
Something To Say About It... "
Check out his first entry - "I
had to let it happen / I had to change"
- by clicking here, and the
second one - "Why
didn't American Life work?" here.
|
|
|
©
2007 MadonnaTribe
- All rights reserved.
|
|
Your favourite stop for latest Madonna
news, previews, articles, exclusive interviews, magazine and
cover scans,
picture galleries, and Community Forum. This site is not endorsed
by Madonna or Warner Bros Records.
From fans to fans, © 2003-2007 Madonna Tribe
|
|
|
|
|